Agent observability and eval tools
Tools from our catalog for seeing what an agent did and checking whether it was right: platforms that trace each LLM call and tool step and run evals on those traces, test frameworks that run evals in CI, and a framework for benchmark-style task suites. The table shows what each covers, whether you can self-host it, and the license.
Several of these pair an open-source part with a hosted product. The self-hosting and license columns say where that line is, as each project documents it.
At a glance
Stars and last push come from GitHub; every other column restates the tool's own docs.
| Tool | Covers | Self-hosting | License | Pricing | Stars | Last push |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arize Phoenix | OpenTelemetry traces, evals, datasets, experiments, prompt playground | Locally, in a container or on Kubernetes | Elastic License 2.0 | Free | 11,840 | |
| Opik | Traces, datasets, experiments, LLM-as-a-judge metrics, monitoring | Docker Compose or Helm; or Comet's cloud | Apache-2.0 | Open source | 22,615 | |
| Langfuse | Traces, prompt management, datasets, evals | Docker Compose, a VM or Kubernetes; or Langfuse Cloud | MIT | Open source | 35,838 | |
| LangSmith | Tracing, evals and monitoring on a hosted platform | Enterprise plan only | MIT | Free tier + paid | 1,079 | |
| Promptfoo | Evals, side-by-side provider comparison, red teaming, PR scanning | Runs locally | MIT | Open source | 26,000 | |
| DeepEval | Pytest-style tests with LLM-as-a-judge and other metrics | Runs locally; shared reports need a Confident AI account | Apache-2.0 | Open source | 18,875 | |
| Inspect | Task suites from datasets, solvers and scorers; 200+ pre-built evals | Runs locally; sandboxes in Docker, Kubernetes, Modal and others | MIT | Open source | 3,005 |
Tracing, with evals on the same data
- Rank 21
Traces LLM and agent apps over OpenTelemetry and runs evals, datasets and experiments in a local UI
Pick it if you want an observability and eval UI on your own machine, instrumented with OpenTelemetry. The Elastic License 2.0 is not OSI open source.
- score 41
- 11.8k stars
- 8.2 stars/day since creation
- pushed
- arize-phoenix-v20.21.4 on
- Elastic License 2.0
Install with pip
pip install arize-phoenix phoenix serveUse it when, skip it if, stats for Arize Phoenix
Why you'd want it
Phoenix collects traces through OpenTelemetry-based OpenInference instrumentation, with integrations for frameworks such as the OpenAI Agents SDK, Claude Agent SDK, LangGraph and Vercel AI SDK across Python, JavaScript, Java and Go. On top of traces it offers LLM-based evals, versioned datasets, experiments, a prompt playground and prompt management. It runs locally with
phoenix serve, in a container or on Kubernetes, and exposes a remote MCP endpoint so Claude Code, Cursor and other MCP clients can query traces, datasets and experiments.Best for
- Local trace debugging during development
- OpenTelemetry-based stacks
- Self-hosted eval and experiment tracking
Use it when
You want an observability and eval UI on your own machine or infrastructure, instrumented with OpenTelemetry rather than a vendor-specific SDK.
Skip it if
You need an OSI open source license or want to offer it as a hosted service; the Elastic License 2.0 forbids that. For a managed platform Arize points to its separate Arize AX product.
Stats
- Stars
- 11,840
- Last push
- Release
- arize-phoenix-v20.21.4,
- License
- Elastic License 2.0
- Pricing
- Free
- Works with
- Docker
- Stars per day, since repo creation
- 8.2
- New and rising score
- 41 of 100
- Rank 26
Traces agent runs and LLM calls, scores them with LLM-as-a-judge metrics and monitors production
Pick it if you want tracing, evaluation and production monitoring under one Apache-2.0 license you can self-host.
- score 38
- 22.6k stars
- 18 stars/day since creation
- pushed
- 2.2.100 on
- Apache-2.0
Install the Python SDK
pip install opik opik configureUse it when, skip it if, stats for Opik
Why you'd want it
Opik, built by Comet, logs nested traces through a
@trackdecorator in Python, a TypeScript SDK or OpenTelemetry, so multi-step agent runs and tool calls show up as full trace trees. It adds datasets, experiments, LLM-as-a-judge metrics for hallucination, moderation and RAG, a PyTest integration for CI, online evaluation rules, dashboards and an Agent Optimizer SDK. The full platform, backend included, is Apache-2.0 and can be self-hosted with Docker Compose or Helm, or used on Comet's cloud.Best for
- Teams that want a fully Apache-2.0 self-hosted platform
- Agent tracing and evals in one tool
- Running LLM evals in PyTest
Use it when
You want tracing, evaluation and production monitoring under one open source license you can self-host, or want your coding agent to read traces through Opik's MCP server.
Skip it if
You only need lightweight offline tests; self-hosting runs a multi-container stack with databases and caches, and the alternative is a Comet account.
Stats
- Stars
- 22,615
- Last push
- Release
- 2.2.100,
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Pricing
- Open source
- Works with
- Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker
- Stars per day, since repo creation
- 18
- New and rising score
- 38 of 100
-
Traces LLM calls and agent steps, then runs evals, datasets and prompt versioning on top of them
Pick it if you need to see what your app did on each request and iterate on prompts against the same traces, self-hosted or in the cloud.
- 35.8k stars
- 28.8 stars/day since creation
- pushed
- v4.59.0 on
- MIT
Install the Python SDK
pip install langfuseUse it when, skip it if, stats for Langfuse
Why you'd want it
Langfuse instruments an app through Python and JS/TS SDKs or integrations such as the OpenAI SDK, LangChain, LlamaIndex, Vercel AI SDK and Mastra, and records LLM calls, retrieval and agent actions as traces you can inspect. The same platform covers prompt management with server and client caching, datasets for pre-deployment tests, and evaluations via LLM-as-a-judge, code evaluators, user feedback and manual labeling. You can use Langfuse Cloud or self-host it with Docker Compose, on a VM or on Kubernetes via Helm.
Best for
- Teams that want to self-host LLM observability
- Tracing, prompts and evals in one place
- Python and JS/TS stacks
Use it when
You need to see what your LLM app or agent did on each request and want to evaluate and iterate on prompts against the same traces.
Skip it if
You do not want to run a server stack yourself and cannot use a hosted account; self-hosting means running the Docker Compose or Kubernetes deployment. Code under the ee/ directories is not MIT licensed.
Stats
- Stars
- 35,838
- Last push
- Release
- v4.59.0,
- License
- MIT
- Pricing
- Open source
- Works with
- Docker
- Stars per day, since repo creation
- 28.8
- Tier
- Standard, not ranked
-
Traces, evaluates and monitors LLM apps and agents on LangChain's hosted platform via Python and JS SDKs
Pick it if you want managed tracing and evals with no servers to run, especially if your app already uses LangChain.
- 1.1k stars
- 0.9 stars/day since creation
- pushed
- v0.14.8 on
- MIT
Install the Python SDK
pip install -U langsmith export LANGSMITH_TRACING=true export LANGSMITH_API_KEY=ls_...Use it when, skip it if, stats for LangSmith
Why you'd want it
LangSmith is LangChain's platform for debugging, evaluating and monitoring language model apps and agents; the MIT-licensed Python and JavaScript SDKs send traces to it, for example by wrapping the OpenAI client. It works with any LLM application and has a native integration with LangChain Python and LangChain JS. There is a free Developer plan with a monthly trace allowance and paid per-seat plans, with pay-as-you-go usage beyond the included traces.
Best for
- Teams already building with LangChain
- Hosted tracing without running infrastructure
- Python and JS/TS apps
Use it when
You want managed tracing and evals with no servers to run, especially if your app already uses LangChain.
Skip it if
You want to self-host without an enterprise contract; self-hosted and hybrid deployment are Enterprise plan options. Usage beyond the included traces is billed pay-as-you-go.
Stats
- Stars
- 1,079
- Last push
- Release
- v0.14.8,
- License
- MIT
- Pricing
- Free tier + paid
- Stars per day, since repo creation
- 0.9
- Tier
- Standard, not ranked
Evals as tests in CI
- Rank 23
Runs evals and red-team scans against prompts, models and agents from a CLI, with a web results viewer
Pick it if you want repeatable local eval runs and red-team scans that can gate changes in CI.
- score 40
- 26k stars
- 20.5 stars/day since creation
- pushed
- code-scan-action-0.2.2 on
- MIT
Install with npm
npm install -g promptfoo promptfoo init --example getting-startedUse it when, skip it if, stats for Promptfoo
Why you'd want it
Promptfoo is a CLI and library that runs automated evaluations of prompts and models, compares providers such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure, Bedrock and Ollama side by side, and shows results in a web viewer. It also does red teaming and vulnerability scanning, and can review pull requests for LLM-related security and compliance issues. Evals run locally, it works with any LLM API or programming language, and it plugs into CI/CD.
Best for
- Regression tests for prompts in CI
- Comparing models side by side
- Red teaming LLM apps before launch
Use it when
You want repeatable, local eval runs and security scans that can gate changes in CI.
Skip it if
You need tracing and monitoring of live production traffic; promptfoo is built around evals, red teaming and code scanning rather than observability.
Stats
- Stars
- 26,000
- Last push
- Release
- code-scan-action-0.2.2,
- License
- MIT
- Pricing
- Open source
- Stars per day, since repo creation
- 20.5
- New and rising score
- 40 of 100
- Rank 37
Unit tests LLM apps and agents in a Pytest-style workflow with LLM-as-a-judge and other metrics
Pick it if you want LLM quality checks written as tests that run locally or in any CI environment.
- score 26
- 18.9k stars
- 16.2 stars/day since creation
- pushed
- python-v4.2.4 on
- Apache-2.0
Install with pip
pip install -U deepevalUse it when, skip it if, stats for DeepEval
Why you'd want it
DeepEval works like Pytest for LLM apps: you write test cases and assert them against metrics such as G-Eval, task completion, tool correctness, answer relevancy, faithfulness and hallucination, then run them with
deepeval test run. Metrics cover agents, RAG, multi-turn chat, MCP use and multimodal output, can be powered by any LLM, and support both end-to-end and component-level evaluation. It also generates synthetic datasets, runs benchmarks like MMLU and GSM8K, and integrates with LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, Pydantic AI and others.Best for
- Python teams that want evals in their test suite
- RAG and agent metrics
- CI checks on LLM output quality
Use it when
You want LLM quality checks written as tests that run locally or in any CI environment.
Skip it if
You are not working in Python (it requires Python 3.9+). Shared reports, iteration comparisons and production monitoring live in the separate Confident AI platform, which needs an account.
Stats
- Stars
- 18,875
- Last push
- Release
- python-v4.2.4,
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Pricing
- Open source
- Stars per day, since repo creation
- 16.2
- New and rising score
- 26 of 100
Benchmark-style evaluation
- Rank 31
Defines and runs model and agent evaluations in Python from datasets, solvers and scorers
Pick it if you want to measure a model or agent on a task suite, including tool use and sandboxed code, and compare providers.
- score 31
- 3k stars
- 2.8 stars/day since creation
- pushed
- 0.3.280 on
- MIT
Install with pip
pip install inspect-aiUse it when, skip it if, stats for Inspect
Why you'd want it
Inspect, from the UK AI Security Institute and Meridian Labs, builds evaluations from composable datasets, solvers (from a single generate call to multi-turn agents with tools) and scorers, and runs them with
inspect eval. It supports custom and MCP tools plus built-in bash, python, web browsing and computer tools, can evaluate external agents like Claude Code, Codex CLI and Gemini CLI, and sandboxes untrusted model code in Docker, Kubernetes, Modal and other systems. It ships over 200 pre-built benchmark evals, support for over 20 model providers, the Inspect View log viewer and a VS Code extension.Best for
- Benchmarking models and agents
- Agentic evals that run code in sandboxes
- Research and safety evaluation teams
Use it when
You want to measure how a model or agent performs on a task suite, including agentic tasks with tools and sandboxed code, and compare results across providers.
Skip it if
You need tracing of a live production app; Inspect is an evaluation framework, and evals are written in Python.
Stats
- Stars
- 3,005
- Last push
- Release
- 0.3.280,
- License
- MIT
- Pricing
- Open source
- Works with
- VS Code
- Stars per day, since repo creation
- 2.8
- New and rising score
- 31 of 100
Newer options worth a look
New and rising tools from the catalog that this guide does not compare yet, by new and rising score. Younger and less proven than the picks above: read each one's skip-it-if first.
- Rank 2
Turns feedback on an agent's live requests into versioned updates to its model weights or its harness
- score 74
- 7.6k stars
- 168 stars/day since creation
- pushed
- v0.1.3 on
- Apache-2.0
Install from PyPI with uv
uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate uv pip install reef-infra python3 -c "import reef; print(reef.__version__)"Use it when, skip it if, stats for Reef
Why you'd want it
Reef sits between an agent and its model as an OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible inference endpoint, records each interaction and returns a receipt that a later report can score or comment on. Recipes turn eligible feedback into updates, either training model weights with Slime and SGLang on a GPU stack or refining the harness, meaning prompts, rules and skills, through a model API with no local GPUs. Accepted updates go into a version history and are served without restarting Reef. The built-in Reefine recipe refines a coding harness from plain-language asks, such as reproducing a bug with a failing test first.
Best for
- Agents that should learn from user feedback
- Harness optimization without GPUs
- Continual learning research
Use it when
You run an agent with a steady stream of tasks or feedback and want that signal to produce evaluated, versioned improvements instead of manual prompt edits.
Skip it if
You want a stable agent today: harness work needs a model endpoint, representative tasks and an evaluator, weight training needs a supported GPU stack, and it is at v0.1.3 with the repo created on 2026-08-31. The harness install pipes a script into bash and the pi adapter runs commands with no sandbox, so keep the install root outside the project the agent works in.
Stats
- Stars
- 7,602
- Last push
- Release
- v0.1.3,
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Pricing
- Open source
- Stars per day, since repo creation
- 168
- New and rising score
- 74 of 100
- Rank 10
Scans agent skills for prompt injection, data exfiltration and supply-chain risks before you install them
- score 52
- 20.2k stars
- 97.1 stars/day since creation
- pushed
- v2.12.0 on
- Apache-2.0
Install with uv
uv tool install git+https://github.com/NVIDIA/skillspector.gitUse it when, skip it if, stats for SkillSpector
Why you'd want it
SkillSpector scans a skill from a Git repo, URL, zip file, directory or single SKILL.md against 71 patterns in 17 categories, including prompt injection, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, MCP tool poisoning and MCP least privilege. It runs static analysis first and an optional LLM evaluation second, gives a 0 to 100 risk score, and writes terminal, JSON, Markdown or SARIF reports. It can also run as an MCP server with a scan_skill tool, so Claude Code, Codex CLI or Gemini CLI can gate skill and MCP installs on the result. It is part of NVIDIA's Verified Skills pipeline.
Best for
- Vetting third-party skills before install
- CI checks with SARIF output
- Gating installs from inside an agent
Use it when
You install skills or MCP servers from public repositories and want a report on risky patterns before they reach your agent.
Skip it if
You only use skills you wrote yourself. The optional LLM analysis sends skill content to the configured provider with your API key; --no-llm runs static checks only. The README notes the stdio MCP transport still has an initialize hang reported in issue #199.
Stats
- Stars
- 20,224
- Last push
- Release
- v2.12.0,
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Pricing
- Open source
- Works with
- Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Docker
- Stars per day, since repo creation
- 97.1
- New and rising score
- 52 of 100
How we chose
Picked from the 95 tools in our catalog, each verified against its own repository and docs; 7 made this guide. Within each group, new and rising tools come first, sorted by the new and rising score (star velocity, recent pushes and releases, repo age and an editorial weight), then the standards, the well-known tools, by name. It is not a benchmark. The number beside a tool is its rank in the full new and rising ledger, not within this guide; standards are not ranked. Install commands are copied from each project's docs; every tool page links to the page they came from. GitHub signals (stars, last push, latest release) were fetched on 2026-10-15. How the new and rising score works.
Frameworks with tracing built in, such as the OpenAI Agents SDK, are covered in AI agent frameworks compared. The MCP Inspector tests MCP servers rather than agents and is left out.
For agents: this guide as markdown at /guides/agent-observability-and-evals-tools.md, and every guide in /tools.json.